# Voice

Distilled from vitalcitynyc.org/contribute and internal editorial practice.

## What Vital City publishes

Smart, accessible writing about how cities work — and how they could work better. Mostly New York, but pieces on other places when the lessons travel. Pragmatic ideas rooted in research and data that might actually improve urban governance, public safety, housing, transit, parks, budgets and the countless other forces that shape city life.

Vital City is not an academic journal. Use hyperlinks, not footnotes.

## Tone

- **Civil conversation**, even (perhaps especially) on contentious topics.
- **Grounded in evidence**, but accessible — the best Vital City pieces are specific enough to be useful and accessible enough to be interesting to someone who doesn't already follow the issue closely.
- **Lively when possible.**
- **Measured, charming, clever** — not smart-aleck-y, not pessimistic, not politically agitative.

## The sweet spot

Some of Vital City's best pieces have been:

- **Deep dives** into policy questions that don't get the attention they deserve — why a particular program succeeded or failed, what the data actually shows about a hotly debated issue, how a reform in another city might translate to New York.
- **"Keyhole" pieces** — small, achievable changes that could yield outsized benefits without requiring a political revolution.
- **Essays that bring readers inside institutions** (jails, parks, transit) and show how decisions really get made.
- **Historical case studies** that illuminate present-day debates.
- **Infographics** that make complex trends legible.
- **Profiles** of people doing unglamorous but important work in city government.

## What catches our attention

- **Policy puzzles** — Why does New York spend more than almost any city on X but get middling results? What would it take to change that?
- **Comparative urbanism** — Another city tried something bold. Did it work? What can New York learn?
- **Data that surprises** — A trend in city data that challenges conventional wisdom.
- **Accountability without outrage** — A fair, specific explanation of why an agency or program isn't delivering, pointing toward solutions.
- **History that illuminates** — A past episode that sheds light on a current debate.
- **Practical fixes** — A specific, achievable reform that doesn't require a new mayor, new governor or new federal administration.

## What Vital City is not interested in

- Invective or ad hominem attacks.
- Partisan scorekeeping.
- Op-eds that are mostly vibes.
- Pieces built primarily on outrage.
- Arguments that blame everything on one villain or assume bad faith.
- Inside-baseball pieces that lose general readers.
- Pieces too general to say anything new.

Writers should be able to **acknowledge the strongest version of opposing views before explaining why they disagree.**

## Format

- **Typical length:** ~1,500 words. Longer essays and shorter punchy arguments both welcome.
- **Hyperlinks, not footnotes.** For academic sources, use the DOI link where possible (`doi.org/[DOI NUMBER]`).
- **Headlines are opinionated and analytical**, not descriptive labels.
  - Good: "1 in 7 days in 2025 were shooting-free" · "The city's reduction in murders lags the nation"
  - Bad: "Shooting-Free Days by Year" · "Murder Rate Changes by City"
- **Headlines** in title case (contra AP). **Deks** in sentence case.
- **No bullet points** in prose pieces unless explicitly requested. Bold key facts for scannability.
- **Pullquotes** set in Gascogne, never in quotation marks.

## Who writes

Writers, public policy practitioners, academics, or something else. Evidence can come from randomized controlled trials, personal experience, reporting, or deep thought and study. Pieces that incorporate data — presented honestly and clearly — are especially valued.

## Pitching

See [`vitalcitynyc.org/contribute`](https://www.vitalcitynyc.org/contribute/) for the current process. A pitch should state the central claim, gesture toward the evidence, and show homework has been done. If accepted, an outline comes before a draft.

---

See [`STYLEBOOK.md`](STYLEBOOK.md) for specific word-choice, punctuation, and usage guidance.